What is the ecological transition?
Home Summary The ecological transition is a process aimed at transforming our society to reduce its environmental impact. It involves moving from a model based
Reading 9 min
June 29, 2025
The NFRD (Non-Financial Reporting Directive) is a European directive requiring large companies to publish non-financial information on their environmental, social and governance (ESG) impacts. Its aim is to improve corporate transparency and accountability to investors and other stakeholders.
% of article read
The NFRD (Non-Financial Reporting Directive) is a European directive adopted in 2014, marking a major turning point in the evolution of corporate transparency. It requires large European companies to publish non-financial information relating to their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) impact.
This directive is part of the European Union’s Action Plan for Sustainable Growth, launched after the 2008 financial crisis. The objective was to strengthen market resilience by integrating risks related to climate change, human rights, and corruption into company valuations.
The NFRD requires companies to publish information regarding their environmental policy (management of greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity), their social commitments (diversity, inclusion, respect for fundamental rights), and their ethical approach (fight against corruption, good governance).
Unlike purely financial obligations, the NFRD introduces the concept of double materiality: companies must assess both how ESG issues impact their business and how their activities impact the environment and society. It primarily concerns large listed companies, but also certain unlisted companies with significant economic clout. With this initiative, the European Union aimed to better inform investors, consumers, and stakeholders by making corporate practices more transparent, comparable, and responsible.
The NFRD was established to meet several sustainability and transparency objectives in the business world.
Improving Transparency: The directive primarily aims to increase corporate transparency regarding their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) impacts. By requiring large organizations to publish accurate and public information on these issues, it provides investors, consumers, and regulators with access to essential data to understand companies' true commitment to sustainability.
Standardizing Non-Financial Reporting: Before the NFRD, ESG information published by companies was often heterogeneous and difficult to compare. By imposing common reporting requirements, the directive helps standardize practices and facilitate comparisons across companies, sectors, and countries. This allows institutional investors to integrate ESG criteria into their asset management.
Strengthening Corporate Responsibility: By requiring companies to report on their policies and results on sensitive issues such as human rights and anti-corruption, the NFRD acts as a lever to encourage organizations to adopt more responsible behavior. This obligation encourages organizations to fully integrate ESG issues into their business strategy.
Facilitating Decision-Making for Stakeholders :The information provided through the NFRD allows investors, clients, and partners to guide their choices based on sustainable criteria. For example, an investor may favor a company that has implemented an ambitious carbon footprint reduction policy or a strong diversity and inclusion policy.
Sign up for a free trial, answer 20 questions, and receive your first carbon footprint assessment!
The NFRD requires large European companies to publish detailed information on their sustainability performance in their annual management report. These obligations are not limited to a simple statement of intent: companies must provide a structured explanation of their approach and results across several key themes.
The areas covered by the NFRD include:
Beyond listing existing policies, the directive requires an explanation of how these policies are implemented, the results achieved, as well as the main risks identified and how they are managed. Companies must also present the key performance indicators (KPIs) they use to measure their progress.
A key principle introduced by the NFRD is double materiality: this involves analyzing both the impact of ESG issues on a company’s financial performance and the company’s impact on the environment and society.
Thus, the NFRD requires companies to provide a clear, comprehensive, and verifiable vision of their sustainability strategy. These requirements are gradually changing the way large companies approach their corporate social responsibility.
The NFRD applies primarily to large European companies with a significant impact on the economy and society. These companies must meet at least two of the following three criteria:
This directive applies to both companies listed on regulated markets and certain large unlisted companies, if they meet the size criteria. It also targets banks, insurers, and other financial institutions that, by the nature of their business, have a major influence on the financing of the economy. Groups of companies are also included: if the parent company meets the thresholds at the consolidated level, it must publish a non-financial report for the entire group.
By targeting these organizations, the NFRD seeks to hold accountable those with the greatest impact on the environment, society, and the economy.
The NFRD has profoundly transformed the way companies approach their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) responsibilities. By imposing structured non-financial reporting, it has pushed large organizations to rethink their governance and strategy to better integrate sustainability issues.
Internally, the directive has required companies to assess their ESG risks much more rigorously, with the creation of new teams dedicated to CSR or sustainable development, the implementation of reliable ESG data collection processes, and the adoption of concrete policies on climate, human rights, diversity, and anti-corruption.
Furthermore, risk management has also evolved. ESG impacts are now considered on the same level as traditional financial risks. This influences strategic decisions, supplier relationships, and internal investment policies.
The NFRD has also increased pressure from investors, regulators, and consumers for greater transparency and accountability. A company that can demonstrate its sincere commitment to sustainable practices benefits from a better reputation, a competitive advantage, and easier access to green financing.
However, meeting the NFRD requirements has also resulted in additional costs for companies: investments in specialized reporting tools, hiring sustainability experts, and internal and external audits. Solutions like D-Carbonize allow organizations to structure their ESG reporting more efficiently while reducing these costs.
The transition from the NFRD to the CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive) marks a major shift in the way European companies will have to report on their sustainability impacts. Adopted in 2021 and gradually coming into force starting in 2024, the CSRD addresses the limitations observed in the application of the NFRD.
The NFRD had enabled significant progress, but it displayed several weaknesses: a lack of precision regarding the expected information, insufficient comparability of reports between companies, and a lack of mandatory external verification. Many investors and regulators felt that the published data was often incomplete, difficult to use, and not always reliable for assessing real ESG risks.
European sustainability regulations can seem complex, given the sheer number of texts. It is therefore essential to understand the difference between the NFRD, CSRD, SFDR, and the European Taxonomy.
The NFRD (Non-Financial Reporting Directive) requires large companies to publish non-financial information on their environmental, social, and governance impacts. It primarily targets companies themselves and is addressed to their stakeholders (investors, customers, and authorities).
The CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive) strengthens and replaces the NFRD. It extends the reporting obligation to a greater number of companies, imposes harmonized standards, and requires external verification of data.
The SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation), on the other hand, concerns the financial sector: it requires investors (banks, investment funds, insurers) to publish information on the sustainability of the financial products they offer, in order to combat greenwashing.
Finally, the European Taxonomy is not a reporting directive but a classification tool. It defines which sectors and economic activities can be considered “sustainable” by setting precise technical criteria.
These texts are complementary and together aim to structure a more transparent and sustainable European economy.
For investors, access to reliable non-financial data has become essential for assessing long-term risks. Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues can directly affect a company’s profitability: exposure to climate regulations, reputational damage, risks related to human rights or governance practices. The transparency imposed by the NFRD allows investors to identify the companies best prepared for sustainable challenges and to integrate these criteria into their capital allocation decisions.
For other stakeholders (customers, employees, NGOs, business partners), expectations regarding social responsibility have never been higher. Consumers increasingly favor committed companies, while talented individuals seek employers aligned with their values. Publishing clear and credible information on ESG practices builds trust, improves brand image, and can become a key competitive differentiator.
Thus, non-financial reporting is not only a regulatory obligation: it is also a strategic opportunity for companies to strengthen their attractiveness and competitiveness.
The NFRD requires companies to report on their ESG practices, but unlike traditional financial regulations, it does not directly provide for harmonized sanctions at the European level in the event of non-compliance.
Thus, each Member State remains free to define the control and sanction mechanisms applicable within its territory. This has led to a certain heterogeneity in implementation: in some countries, the absence or inadequacy of reporting can result in administrative fines, while in others, pressure is primarily exerted by the market and reputation.
In practice, companies that do not publish or publish insufficient information are primarily exposed to significant reputational risks. Investors, NGOs, and the media can report these shortcomings, negatively impacting the company’s brand image and reducing its ability to attract financing.
With the introduction of the CSRD, control is strengthened: external verification becomes mandatory, and companies must provide accurate, standardized, and audited data. This development aims to ensure effective transparency and establish fair competition between economic actors in terms of sustainable commitment.
Home Summary The ecological transition is a process aimed at transforming our society to reduce its environmental impact. It involves moving from a model based
Home Summary Grants and subsidies support companies in their ecological transition by reducing the initial costs related to sustainable projects. They promote innovation, the adoption
Contact us to receive a link and schedule your appointment. We’ll answer all of your questions.
Adding {{itemName}} to cart
Added {{itemName}} to cart